linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230120113802.azac2q6rqoozlpdi@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:38:02 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        james.quinlan@...adcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, wleavitt@...vell.com,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com, nicola.mazzucato@....com,
        tarek.el-sherbiny@....com, quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:56:32AM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:11:24AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> 
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> thanks for trying this out.
> 
> > I haven't seen a description of the <M>. I figured out that this is
> > the protocol id to which the channel was associated in DT while
> > testing it but it could be good to describe this somewhere.
> 
> Ah, damn yes, I had made a note to myself to add an explicit description
> of how the channel number IDs are chosen, then I forgot :P
> 
> I'll add a follow-on patch once is queued.
>

Please post it ASAP so that I can include it before I tag, just trying
to avoid missing it now and sending it as fix later :).

> > Apart from this minor thing, I have tested it with an scmi server
> > embedded in OPTEE and run the scmi compliance tests. Everything works
> > fine using the default mode or using one specific channel.
> > 
> > FWIW
> > Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

Thanks Vincent and Florian. I just pulled and merged this last night, will
update to include your Tested-by tags.

--
Regards,
Sudeep