[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3865e4ae-99e9-bba7-6abf-76d92e79b178@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:06:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc: Mark Yacoub <markyacoub@...omium.org>, quic_khsieh@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
robdclark@...il.com, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com,
matthew.d.roper@...el.com, imre.deak@...el.com,
lucas.demarchi@...el.com, manasi.d.navare@...el.com,
swati2.sharma@...el.com, bhanuprakash.modem@...el.com,
javierm@...hat.com, jose.souza@...el.com, lyude@...hat.com,
hbh25y@...il.com, arun.r.murthy@...el.com,
ashutosh.dixit@...el.com, ankit.k.nautiyal@...el.com,
maxime@...no.tech, swboyd@...omium.org,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
johan+linaro@...nel.org, dianders@...omium.org, marex@...x.de,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
abhinavk@...eaurora.org, seanpaul@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP
in dp-controller
On 20/01/2023 16:54, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:35:32AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/01/2023 20:30, Mark Yacoub wrote:
>>> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
>>>
>>> This patch adds the register ranges required for HDCP key injection and
>>
>> Do not use "This commit/patch".
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
>>
>> This applies to all your patches. Fix it everywhere.
>
> My goodness, this is peak bikeshedding. Surely we have better things to do with
> our time?
What do you mean "better things to do"? I review the patches as that's
expected from maintainer. I spend a lot of time on so indeed I could
find some other ways to use it.
I spot something which is obvious mistake, although trivial and not
important, but clicking automated answer is also trivial for me and
fast. And yes. 90% of my reviews answers are automated because people
cannot learn to test before sending, cannot learn to read Submitting
Patches and many other trivial things. Clicking this automated answer
was also trivial from my point, but entire discussion including your
disagreement about incorrect title (read Submitting Patches) instead of
just implementing it - is waste of time.
I'll then consider not wasting time on your patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists