linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <f8922fbc-13cc-4f08-a8e8-08d39ab7d63c@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 22:57:05 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Andrew Davis" <afd@...com>, "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "Daniel Tang" <dt.tangr@...il.com>,
        "Fabian Vogt" <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023, at 22:49, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This series is an extended version of the series started here[0]
> and here[1].
>
> We break out what was the first patch into one for DTS change and
> one for code changes as suggested by Krzysztof. Those are now patches
> 2 and 8 of this series (I kept the ACKs, hope that is okay).
>
> As also pointed out by Krzysztof syscon nodes need a specific
> compatible, add that as patch 1.
>
> While I was adding that, I noticed some other dtbs_check issues,
> so while here fixed some of those up too (patches 3-6).

Looks all good to me, if there are no final comments within the
next few days, can you send this all to:soc@...nel.org, either as
separate patches or as two pull requests (dts and code) based
on 6.2-rc-1?

I think I previously commented on the lack of an entry in
the MAINTAINERS. It would be nice to have one more patch to
add this, whichever way you want to split this with Daniel,
adding one or both of you as maintainer and/or reviewer.
I'd keep that separate from this series though, to not hold
it up any longer.

     Arnd