linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ab320ef-dfbb-eee4-f895-6f1caa6cc66f@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:56:49 -0600
From:   Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>,
        Fabian Vogt <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] TI-Nspire cleanups

On 1/23/23 3:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023, at 22:49, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This series is an extended version of the series started here[0]
>> and here[1].
>>
>> We break out what was the first patch into one for DTS change and
>> one for code changes as suggested by Krzysztof. Those are now patches
>> 2 and 8 of this series (I kept the ACKs, hope that is okay).
>>
>> As also pointed out by Krzysztof syscon nodes need a specific
>> compatible, add that as patch 1.
>>
>> While I was adding that, I noticed some other dtbs_check issues,
>> so while here fixed some of those up too (patches 3-6).
> 
> Looks all good to me, if there are no final comments within the
> next few days, can you send this all to:soc@...nel.org, either as
> separate patches or as two pull requests (dts and code) based
> on 6.2-rc-1?
> 

Sure thing.

> I think I previously commented on the lack of an entry in
> the MAINTAINERS. It would be nice to have one more patch to
> add this, whichever way you want to split this with Daniel,
> adding one or both of you as maintainer and/or reviewer.
> I'd keep that separate from this series though, to not hold
> it up any longer.
> 

Daniel,

Do you want to do this? If not I can add myself as a reviewer, the
point of this series is to boil down the support to just the DTS file,
at which point hopefully we won't need too much maintenance.

Andrew

>       Arnd