[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3668657.1674466725@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:38:45 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Rename BIO_NO_PAGE_REF to BIO_PAGE_REFFED and invert the meaning
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> ... I've put together a version of this series that implements this and my
> other suggestions here:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dio-pin-pages
>
> This also tests fine with xfs and btrfs and nvme passthrough I/O.
That looks okay. Do you need to put a Co-developed-by tag on the "block:
invert BIO_NO_PAGE_REF" patch?
Should I take that set of patches and send it on to Linus when the window
opens? Or should it go through the block tree?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists