linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Rename BIO_NO_PAGE_REF to BIO_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y85Z511xeGSwmlhG@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:56:55 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Rename BIO_NO_PAGE_REF to BIO_PAGE_REFFED
 and invert the meaning

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:38:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> That looks okay.  Do you need to put a Co-developed-by tag on the "block:
> invert BIO_NO_PAGE_REF" patch?

I can do if you want, although there's really not much left of the
original.

> Should I take that set of patches and send it on to Linus when the window
> opens?  Or should it go through the block tree?

I think the block tree would be better.