[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230123131931.263024-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:49:28 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: andersson@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix SMMU on SDX55 and SDX65
Hi,
Both SDX55 and SDX65 SoCs are using the Qcom version of the ARM SMMU-500
IP. Even though the SoC specfic compatibles were being used in devicetree,
the compatibles were not added to the arm-smmu-qcom driver. So they end up
using the generic ARM SMMU-500 driver instead.
Spotting this discrepancy, the recent arm,smmu bindings change moved these
SoCs under the non-qcom implementation of the SMMU.
This series fixes the binding by moving the compatibles under qcom impl.
and also adding the "qcom,smmu-500" fallback compatible to the devicetree
so that the qcom implementation can be used without adding SoC specific
entries to the driver.
Thanks,
Mani
Manivannan Sadhasivam (3):
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Fix binding for SDX55 and SDX65
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55: Add Qcom SMMU-500 as the fallback for IOMMU
node
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add Qcom SMMU-500 as the fallback for IOMMU
node
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 10 ++--------
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx55.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists