linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:22:54 +0100
From:   Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL

On Monday, 23 January 2023 14:51:57 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > Please disregard this patch.
> > I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch
> > submissions, which is the following:
> > 
> > I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error,
> > incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the
> > copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license.
> > 
> > Apologies for the noise.
> 
> Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by
> a bot. Care to vary your sentences?

I already got a bounce as I am now considered a spammer :-/

So now I got to figure out how to fix this clusterfsck, without being seen as
a spammer/bot, while also trying to minimize the burden on others.

I couldn't agree more with (the first paragraph of)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ad99d227-ce82-319b-6323-b70ac009d0e7@roeck-us.net/
and I therefor consider this a legal issue and not a spelling one.
I can't answer the legal issue, hence the request for retraction.

Regards,
  Diederik
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)