linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9d6291f-8b50-bd37-f48c-d96834d990dd@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 20:51:57 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL

On 1/23/23 19:48, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:15:15 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Similar response as [1].
> 
> Please disregard this patch.
> I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch 
> submissions, which is the following:
> 
> I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, incorrect. I 
> would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the copyright holder 
> which I believe is needed to change the license.
> 
> Apologies for the noise.

Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by
a bot. Care to vary your sentences?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara