[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230123143202.1785569-1-Ilia.Gavrilov@infotecs.ru>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:31:54 +0000
From: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
To: "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>,
"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>, "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"kadlec@...filter.org" <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lvc-project@...uxtesting.org" <lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] netfilter: conntrack: remote a return value of the
'seq_print_acct' function.
The static 'seq_print_acct' function always returns 0.
Change the return value to 'void' and remove unnecessary checks.
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
(linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 1ca9e41770cb ("netfilter: Remove uses of seq_<foo> return values")
Signed-off-by: Ilia.Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
---
V2: Fix coding style
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
index 0250725e38a4..6819d07f9692 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static const char* l4proto_name(u16 proto)
return "unknown";
}
-static unsigned int
+static void
seq_print_acct(struct seq_file *s, const struct nf_conn *ct, int dir)
{
struct nf_conn_acct *acct;
@@ -283,14 +283,12 @@ seq_print_acct(struct seq_file *s, const struct nf_conn *ct, int dir)
acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
if (!acct)
- return 0;
+ return;
counter = acct->counter;
seq_printf(s, "packets=%llu bytes=%llu ",
(unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].packets),
(unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].bytes));
-
- return 0;
}
/* return 0 on success, 1 in case of error */
@@ -342,8 +340,7 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
if (seq_has_overflowed(s))
goto release;
- if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL))
- goto release;
+ seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL);
if (!(test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status)))
seq_puts(s, "[UNREPLIED] ");
@@ -352,8 +349,7 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
ct_show_zone(s, ct, NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_REPL);
- if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_REPLY))
- goto release;
+ seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_REPLY);
if (test_bit(IPS_HW_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status))
seq_puts(s, "[HW_OFFLOAD] ");
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists