[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e48a7629-f357-ed3c-9f43-b1499930ceff@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:51:35 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
To: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip update for FRED
system
On 24/01/2023 9:32 pm, Li, Xin3 wrote:
>> From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
>>
>> This is an RFC patchset v3:
>> sysret_rip test update for Intel FRED architecture.
>>
>> Xin Li reported sysret_rip test fails at:
>>
>> assert(ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EFL] ==
>> ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_R11]);
> On FRED systems, flags is 0x200a93 and r11 is 0xfeedfacedeadbeef here.
Is this under SIMICS, or elsewhere? It's doubly weird that flags/%r11
match, but %rip/%rcx don't.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists