[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734D1FC972F663487E9140DA8C99@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:20:11 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>,
x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip update for FRED
system
> >>
> >> Xin Li reported sysret_rip test fails at:
> >>
> >> assert(ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EFL] ==
> >> ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_R11]);
> >
> >On FRED systems, flags is 0x200a93 and r11 is 0xfeedfacedeadbeef here.
> >
> >We need to remove or change this assertion, maybe:
> > assert(ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EFL] == ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_R11] ||
> > r11_sentinel == ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_R11]);
> >
> >>
> >> in a FRED system. Let's handle the FRED system scenario too. The 'syscall'
> >> instruction in a FRED system doesn't set %r11=%rflags.
> >>
>
> This should use check_regs_result() – which is exactly the reason I made that a
> separate function.
Exactly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists