[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0vjfv2a.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:04:45 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Docs/sound/index: Add missing SPDX License
Identifier
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On 1/23/23 02:10, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:36:50 +0100,
>> SeongJae Park wrote:
>>>
>>> Add missing SPDX License Identifier for sound documentation index file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>
> Isn't GPL-2.0 deprecated? It should be GPL-2.0-only, no?
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html
The kernel community hasn't really followed along with that change on
the part of the SPDX folks; as far as I know, GPL-2.0 is considered to
be just fine. There are currently more than twice as many GPL-2.0
declarations than GPL-2.0-only.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists