lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0vjfv2a.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:04:45 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Docs/sound/index: Add missing SPDX License
 Identifier

Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> On 1/23/23 02:10, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:36:50 +0100,
>> SeongJae Park wrote:
>>>
>>> Add missing SPDX License Identifier for sound documentation index file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>
> Isn't GPL-2.0 deprecated? It should be GPL-2.0-only, no?
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html

The kernel community hasn't really followed along with that change on
the part of the SPDX folks; as far as I know, GPL-2.0 is considered to
be just fine.  There are currently more than twice as many GPL-2.0
declarations than GPL-2.0-only.

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ