[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a627ftuf.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:31:04 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Docs: Add missing SPDX license identifiers of
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> writes:
> Some subsystem documents are missing SPDX license identifiers on index
> files. This patchset adds those.
>
> Changes from v1
> (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230114194741.115855-2-sj@kernel.org/)
> - Separate from index file content changes
> - Separate patch for each subsystem doc (Alex Deucher)
> - Use MIT license for gpu (Alex Deucher)
>
> SeongJae Park (8):
> Docs/crypto/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/driver-api/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/gpu/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/hwmon/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/input/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/mm/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/scheduler/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
> Docs/sound/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier
So I've applied patches 2 (since I wrote the initial file) and 8 (with
Takashi's ack). The others are also fine, I think, but I hesitate to
apply license texts to files without knowing that they match the
author's intent. I hate to say it, but I think the best approach is to
send each of the remaining patches to the appropriate maintainers for
the subsystem involved.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists