[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7058fb92642a1661995d7d3ca6411bd.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:00:19 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Rayyan Ansari <rayyan@...ari.sh>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] clk: qcom: smd: Add XO RPM clocks for MSM8226/MSM8974
Quoting Rayyan Ansari (2023-01-25 14:25:08)
> On 25/01/2023 20:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rayyan Ansari (2023-01-21 11:25:38)
> >> Add the XO and XO_A clocks to the MSM8974 clock list, which is also
> >> used on MSM8226.
> >
> > Why was this missing for so long? Does this break suspend? Why are you
> > adding it now?
>
> I am adding it because of a recommendation from a maintainer on an older
> patch version.
> See
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230119023337.h6a7f56lizhv4tcy@builder.lan/#t
So nobody has tested this on msm8974? Can you add this information to
the commit text? And can it be tested on msm8974?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists