[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9G04vGaa77Jb0EB@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 06:01:54 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Handle syscall in
a FRED system
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 04:17:12AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> +/*
> + * REGS_SAVED = %rcx and %r11 preserved.
> + * REGS_SYSRET = %rcx and %r11 set to %rflags and %rip.
> + * REGS_ERROR = %rcx and/or %r11 set to any other values.
Since we moved the assertion into check_regs_result(), we no longer
need REGS_ERROR. check_regs_result() is now a void function.
Will remove that comment...
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists