[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9FpxEz2+LJc7vJP@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 00:41:24 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED
architecture
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 09:24:40AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On January 25, 2023 9:07:18 AM PST, "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com> wrote:
> > Would it be better to get this patch set merged first?
> >
> > Otherwise surely I will include it in the FRED patch set.
>
> If the maintainers are ok with it, it would be better to merge it
> sooner: once we have agreed on the semantics, which I believe we
> have, we should be testing those semantics and nothing else.
OK, let's keep this patchset separated from the FRED support
patchset.
In the meantime, let me address the recent HPA's comments.
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists