[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b5911ec-9993-5540-6de5-c62c7c446274@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:50:46 +0100
From: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] thermal: mediatek: try again if first temp read is
bogus
Hi Daniel,
On 1/25/23 11:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 25/01/2023 10:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
>> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of 0
>> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>> index b8e06f6c7c42..e7be450cd40a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
>> * not immediately shut down.
>> */
>> if (temp > 200000)
>> - temp = 0;
>> + temp = -EAGAIN;
>
> Did you try to add a delay between the bank init and the thermal zone device register (eg. 1ms) ?
>
> May be the HW did not have time to initialize and capture a temperature before thermal_zone_device_register() is called (this one calls get_temp) ?
A delay of 29 ms actually fixed the issue, thanks for the suggestion. I can send a V9 with this improvement.
Is there anything else to fix perhaps ?
Regards,
Amjad
>
>> if (temp > max)
>> max = temp;
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists