[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4da4803-134c-72aa-a24c-cc6fc3d8acc5@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:54:03 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] thermal: mediatek: try again if first temp read is
bogus
Hi Amjad,
On 27/01/2023 11:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 1/25/23 11:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 25/01/2023 10:50, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
>>> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of 0
>>> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> index b8e06f6c7c42..e7be450cd40a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct
>>> mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
>>> * not immediately shut down.
>>> */
>>> if (temp > 200000)
>>> - temp = 0;
>>> + temp = -EAGAIN;
>>
>> Did you try to add a delay between the bank init and the thermal zone
>> device register (eg. 1ms) ?
>>
>> May be the HW did not have time to initialize and capture a
>> temperature before thermal_zone_device_register() is called (this one
>> calls get_temp) ?
>
> A delay of 29 ms actually fixed the issue, thanks for the suggestion. I
> can send a V9 with this improvement.
I'm glad that helped.
Will you remove the "if (temp > 200000)" test ?
> Is there anything else to fix perhaps ?
Not in your changes
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists