lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0871074a-cafb-a172-f062-6ada6d2a3a41@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:55:34 +0800 From: "liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@...wei.com> To: <guoren@...nel.org>, <palmer@...belt.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, <penberg@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com> CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobe: Fixup kernel panic when probing an illegal position 在 2023/1/26 21:05, guoren@...nel.org 写道: > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com> > > The kernel would panic when probed for an illegal position. eg: > > (CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n) > > echo 'p:hello kernel_clone+0x16 a0=%a0' >> kprobe_events > echo 1 > events/kprobes/hello/enable > cat trace > > Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack > is corrupted in: __do_sys_newfstatat+0xb8/0xb8 > CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: sh Not tainted > 6.2.0-rc1-00027-g2d398fe49a4d #490 > Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff80007268>] dump_backtrace+0x38/0x48 > [<ffffffff80c5e83c>] show_stack+0x50/0x68 > [<ffffffff80c6da28>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84 > [<ffffffff80c6da6c>] dump_stack+0x20/0x30 > [<ffffffff80c5ecf4>] panic+0x160/0x374 > [<ffffffff80c6db94>] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x0/0xa8 > [<ffffffff802deeb0>] sys_newstat+0x0/0x30 > [<ffffffff800158c0>] sys_clone+0x20/0x30 > [<ffffffff800039e8>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x4 > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: > Kernel stack is corrupted in: __do_sys_newfstatat+0xb8/0xb8 ]--- > > That is because the kprobe's ebreak instruction broke the kernel's > original code. The user should guarantee the correction of the probe > position, but it couldn't make the kernel panic. > > This patch adds arch_check_kprobe in arch_prepare_kprobe to prevent an > illegal position (Such as the middle of an instruction). > > Fixes: c22b0bcb1dd0 ("riscv: Add kprobes supported") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > index f21592d20306..475989f06d6d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > @@ -48,6 +48,21 @@ static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) > post_kprobe_handler(p, kcb, regs); > } > > +static bool __kprobes arch_check_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > +{ > + unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)p->addr - p->offset; > + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p->addr; > + > + while (tmp <= addr) { > + if (tmp == addr) > + return true; > + > + tmp += GET_INSN_LENGTH(*(kprobe_opcode_t *)tmp); > + } > + > + return false; > +} LGTM. I have submit a patch to fix the same problem, found at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230127130541.1250865-11-chenguokai17@mails.ucas.ac.cn/ So this boundary check is necessary no matter CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C is enable or not, right? > + > int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > { > unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr; > @@ -55,6 +70,9 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > if (probe_addr & 0x1) > return -EILSEQ; > > + if (!arch_check_kprobe(p)) > + return -EILSEQ; > + > /* copy instruction */ > p->opcode = *p->addr; > -- BR, Liao, Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists