[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230130105549.70044a51.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:55:49 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:49:16 +0100
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the report, Stephen.
>
> Alex,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:13:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 895c0747f726 ("vfio/type1: Respect IOMMU reserved regions in vfio_test_domain_fgsp()")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 1369459b2e21 ("iommu: Add a gfp parameter to iommu_map()")
> >
> > from the iommu tree.
>
> In case you want to fix this up in your tree, the patch-set causing this
> is in a separate branch in the IOMMU tree which you can merge into your
> tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git iommu-memory-accounting
Hi Joerg,
The conflict is with mainline, not my next branch. The commit above
went in as a fix for v6.2. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists