[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9gFqyDctgECQnSQ@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:00:11 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:55:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:49:16 +0100
> Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the report, Stephen.
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:13:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 895c0747f726 ("vfio/type1: Respect IOMMU reserved regions in vfio_test_domain_fgsp()")
> > >
> > > from Linus' tree and commit:
> > >
> > > 1369459b2e21 ("iommu: Add a gfp parameter to iommu_map()")
> > >
> > > from the iommu tree.
> >
> > In case you want to fix this up in your tree, the patch-set causing this
> > is in a separate branch in the IOMMU tree which you can merge into your
> > tree:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git iommu-memory-accounting
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> The conflict is with mainline, not my next branch. The commit above
> went in as a fix for v6.2. Thanks,
I usually sort out conflicts against the rc series when I send a PR, I
pulled Joerg's branch so I can deal with these conflicts, they are
trivial enough
There will be another -rc conflict from rdma as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230129093757.637354-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists