linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:00:11 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:55:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:49:16 +0100
> Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the report, Stephen.
> > 
> > Alex,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:13:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   895c0747f726 ("vfio/type1: Respect IOMMU reserved regions in vfio_test_domain_fgsp()")
> > > 
> > > from Linus' tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >   1369459b2e21 ("iommu: Add a gfp parameter to iommu_map()")
> > > 
> > > from the iommu tree.  
> > 
> > In case you want to fix this up in your tree, the patch-set causing this
> > is in a separate branch in the IOMMU tree which you can merge into your
> > tree:
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git iommu-memory-accounting
> 
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> The conflict is with mainline, not my next branch.  The commit above
> went in as a fix for v6.2.  Thanks,

I usually sort out conflicts against the rc series when I send a PR, I
pulled Joerg's branch so I can deal with these conflicts, they are
trivial enough

There will be another -rc conflict from rdma as well:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230129093757.637354-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com

Jason