[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230130074500.GA12687@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:15:00 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: fix platform_msi_domain_free_irqs()
reference
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:03:45PM +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Mani and Arnd,
>
> On 1/27/2023 2:02 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:17:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > >
> > > The newly added MSI support is mostly hidden inside of an #ifdef,
> > > except for one line that now causes a build failure when MSI
> > > is disabled:
> > >
> > > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c: In function 'ufs_qcom_remove':
> > > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c:1698:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'platform_msi_domain_free_irqs' [-Werror=i]
> > > 1698 | platform_msi_domain_free_irqs(hba->dev);
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Above that, the symbol that guards the other call was recently
> > > removed, so that is all dead code at the moment.
> > >
> > > Remove the incorrect #ifdef and instead of a Kconfig dependency
> > > to only allow building the driver when CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
> > > is enabled. This symbol is always present when PCI_MSI
> > > or ARM_GIC_V3_ITS are enabled, both of which should be present
> > > on kernels that can run on Qualcomm SoCs.
> > >
> > > The 'select RESET_CONTROLLER' in combination with this dependency
> > > unfortunately causes a dependency loop and this is a user-visible
> > > symbol, so it's better to change both to 'depends on'.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 519b6274a777 ("scsi: ufs: qcom: Add MCQ ESI config vendor specific ops")
> > > Fixes: 13e7accb81d6 ("genirq: Get rid of GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
> >
> > > ---
> > > Not sure if this is the best solution, both the GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
> > > dependencies and the RESET_CONTROLLER dependencies are a bit
> > > inconsistent already. Feel free to pick another approach that
> > > addresses both of the bugs I found.
> > I think your proposed solution works best at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
> > > index 139064e70a34..663881437921 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
> > > @@ -57,8 +57,9 @@ config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PLATFORM
> > > config SCSI_UFS_QCOM
> > > tristate "QCOM specific hooks to UFS controller platform driver"
> > > depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM && ARCH_QCOM
> > > + depends on GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
> > > + depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
> > > select QCOM_SCM if SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
> > > - select RESET_CONTROLLER
> > > help
> > > This selects the QCOM specific additions to UFSHCD platform driver.
> > > UFS host on QCOM needs some vendor specific configuration before
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > index 681da3ea7154..eb66b5f6cf19 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > @@ -1538,7 +1538,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_get_outstanding_cqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > > static void ufs_qcom_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
> > > @@ -1626,13 +1625,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -#else
> > > -static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > -{
> > > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * struct ufs_hba_qcom_vops - UFS QCOM specific variant operations
> > > *
> > > --
> > > 2.39.0
> > >
>
> Thank you for pointing to 13e7accb81d6 ("genirq: Get rid of
> GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN"),
>
> which I was not aware of. I am thinking about fixing it just like how
>
> 13e7accb81d6 ("genirq: Get rid of GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN") is fixing
> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c -
>
> In ufs-qcom.c, use CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ instead of
> CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN,
>
> and meanwhile add #ifdef check before calling
> platform_msi_domain_free_irqs().
>
> Please let me know your idea.
>
No. Let's get rid of the ifdef's please... I like Arnd's patch as it models the
dependency nicely in Kconfig. And most (all?) of the qcom platforms require
GENERIC_MSI_IRQ and RESET_CONTROLLER one way or the other anyway.
Thanks,
Mani
>
> Thanks.
> Regards,
> Can Guo
>
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists