lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6605d52-b9e1-e8d3-ed29-562146f64eea@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:04:03 +0000
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     sedat.dilek@...il.com, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Ben Hutchings <benh@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [6.1.7][6.2-rc5] perf all metrics test: FAILED!



On 30/01/2023 02:24, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> ?
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:21 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:59 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [ CC LLVM linux folks + Ben from Debian kernel team ]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am playing with LLVM version 16.0.0-rc1 which was released yesterday and PERF.
>>>
>>> After building my selfmade LLVM toolchain, I built perf and run some
>>> perf tests here on my Intel SandyBridge CPU (details see below).
>>>
>>> perf all metrics test: FAILED!
>>>
>>> ...with both Debian's perf version 6.1.7 and my selfmade version 6.2-rc5.
>>>
>>> Just noticed:
>>>
>>> Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating
>>> BPF maps, etc
>>>
>>> Run the below tests with `sudo` - made this go away - still FAILED.
>>>
>>> But maybe I am missing to activate some sysfs/debug or whatever other stuff?
>>
>> Hi Sedat,
>>
>> things have been improving wrt metrics and so this failure may have
>> just been because of the addition of a previously missing metric. The
>> rlimit thing shouldn't affect things but maybe file descriptors?
>> Looking at the test output the issue is:
>>
>> ```
>> Metric 'tma_dram_bound' not printed in:
>> # Running 'internals/synthesize' benchmark:
>> Computing performance of single threaded perf event synthesis by
>> synthesizing events on the perf process itself:
>>   Average synthesis took: 207.680 usec (+- 0.176 usec)
>>   Average num. events: 30.000 (+- 0.000)
>>   Average time per event 6.923 usec
>>   Average data synthesis took: 217.833 usec (+- 0.202 usec)
>>   Average num. events: 161.000 (+- 0.000)
>>   Average time per event 1.353 usec
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for 'perf bench internals synthesize':
>>
>>      <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
>>                          (0,00%)
>>      <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
>>                          (0,00%)
>>      <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
>>                          (0,00%)
>>      <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
>>                             (0,00%)
>> ```
>>
>> So the test was checking to see whether the tma_dram_bound metric
>> could be computed on your Sandybridge and it failed. The event counts
>> below show that every event came back "<not counted>" which is usually
>> indicative of a permissions problem - it is also not surprising given
>> this that the metric wasn't computed. You could try repeating the
>> command the test is trying with something like "perf stat -M
>> tma_dram_bound -a sleep 1", but running as root should have resolved
>> that issue. Does that give you enough to keep exploring?
>>
> 
> Hi Ian,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback!
> 
> I booted into my Debian kernel - just to see what happens.
> 
> # cat /proc/version
> Linux version 6.1.0-2-amd64 (debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org) (gcc-12
> (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40) #1
> SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.7-1 (2023-01-18)
> 
> All things run as root...
> 
> # echo 0 | tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> 0
> 
> # /usr/bin/perf test 10 92 98 99 100 101
> 10: PMU events                                                      :
> 10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
> 10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
> 10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
> 10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
> 92: perf record tests                                               : Ok
> 98: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
> 99: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
> 100: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
> 101: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
> 
> # perf stat -M tma_dram_bound -a sleep 1
> 
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> 
>     <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
>                   (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
>                      (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
>               (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
>                         (0,00%)
> 

Hi Sedat,

I also had this failure and did a git bisect, but it led me to the
conclusion that it is a stale build issue rather than a regression.

There was a recent commit that renamed/removed some json PMU files which
the build system can't cope with. I think the tests end up iterating
over a different set of event names than were generated by the build system.

If you do a clean build the issue should go away. I don't know if there
is anything more we can do to stop this from happening.

James

>       1,002148600 seconds time elapsed
> 
> Hmm... looking at... Metric 'tma_l3_bound' ...
> 
> Running...
> 
> # perf stat --verbose -M tma_l3_bound -a sleep 1
> Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-2A-7
> metric expr (MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT /
> (MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT + 7 *
> MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS)) *
> CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING / CLKS for tma_l3_bound
> metric expr CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD for CLKS
> 
> found event MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
> found event CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
> found event CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
> found event MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
> 
> Parsing metric events
> '{MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT/metric-id=MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT/,CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING/metric-id=CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PEND
> ING/,CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/metric-id=CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/,MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS/metric-id=MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS/}:W'
> MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT -> cpu/event=0xd1,period=0xc365,umask=0x4/
> CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING ->
> cpu/event=0xa3,cmask=0x5,period=0x1e8483,umask=0x5/
> CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD -> cpu/event=0x3c,period=0x1e8483/
> MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS -> cpu/event=0xd4,period=0x186a7,umask=0x2/
> 
> Control descriptor is not initialized
> 
> MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT: 0 4007421228 0
> CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING: 0 4007421228 0
> CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD: 0 4007421228 0
> MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS: 0 4007421228 0
> 
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> 
>     <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
>                   (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
>                      (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
>               (0,00%)
>     <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
>                         (0,00%)
> 
>       1,002310013 seconds time elapsed
> 
> So those events/metric-ids resulting in "<not counted>" are all found.
> 
> What means "Control descriptor is not initialized"?
> 
> To summarize:
> 
> Those two tests in "100: perf all metrics test" FAILED:
> 
> 1. tma_dram_bound
> 2. tma_l3_bound
> 
> Best regards,
> -Sedat-
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>>> Last perf version which was OK:
>>>
>>> ~/bin/perf -v
>>> perf version 6.0.0
>>>
>>> echo "linux-perf: Adjust limited access to performance monitoring and
>>> observability operations"
>>> echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
>>> 0
>>>
>>> ~/bin/perf test 10 86 92 93 94 95
>>> 10: PMU events                                                      :
>>> 10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
>>> 10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
>>> 10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
>>> 10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
>>> 86: perf record tests                                               : Ok
>>> 92: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
>>> 93: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
>>> 94: perf all metrics test                                           : Ok
>>> 95: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
>>>
>>> echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
>>> echo "linux-perf: Reset limited access to performance monitoring and
>>> observability operations"
>>>
>>> If you need further information, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Sedat-
>>>
>>> P.S. Instructions
>>>
>>> [ REPRODUCER ]
>>>
>>> LLVM_MVER="16"
>>>
>>> # Debian LLVM
>>> ##LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH="/usr/lib/llvm-${LLVM_MVER}/bin"
>>> # Selfmade LLVM
>>> LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH="/opt/llvm/bin"
>>> if [ -d ${LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH} ]; then
>>>    export PATH="${LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH}:${PATH}"
>>> fi
>>>
>>> PYTHON_VER="3.11"
>>> MAKE="make"
>>> MAKE_OPTS="V=1 -j1 HOSTCC=clang-$LLVM_MVER HOSTLD=ld.lld
>>> HOSTAR=llvm-ar CC=clang-$LLVM_MVER LD=ld.lld AR=llvm-ar
>>> STRIP=llvm-strip"
>>>
>>> echo "LLVM MVER ........ $LLVM_MVER"
>>> echo "Path settings .... $PATH"
>>> echo "Python version ... $PYTHON_VER"
>>> echo "make line ........ $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS"
>>>
>>> LANG=C LC_ALL=C make -C tools/perf clean 2>&1 | tee ../make-log_perf-clean.txt
>>>
>>> LANG=C LC_ALL=C $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf
>>> PYTHON=python${PYTHON_VER} install-bin 2>&1 | tee
>>> ../make-log_perf-install_bin_python${PYTHON_VER}_llvm${LLVM_MVER}.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> [ TESTS ]
>>>
>>> [ TESTS - START ]
>>>
>>> echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
>>>
>>> [ TESTS - DEBIAN ]
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/perf -v
>>> perf version 6.1.7
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/perf test 10 92 98 99 100 101
>>>
>>>  10: PMU events                                                      :
>>>  10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
>>>  10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
>>>  10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
>>>  10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
>>>  92: perf record tests                                               : Ok
>>>  98: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
>>>  99: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
>>> 100: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
>>> 101: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
>>>
>>> [ TESTS - DILEKS ]
>>>
>>> ~/bin/perf -v
>>> perf version 6.2.0-rc5
>>>
>>> ~/bin/perf test 7 87 93 94 95 96
>>>
>>>   7: PMU events                                                      :
>>>   7.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
>>>   7.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
>>>   7.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
>>>   7.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
>>>  87: perf record tests                                               : Ok
>>>  93: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
>>>  94: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
>>>  95: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
>>>  96: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
>>>
>>> [ TESTS - FAILED ]
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/perf test --verbose 100 2>&1 | tee
>>> perf-test-verbose-100-perf-all-metrics-test_debian-perf-6-1-7.txt
>>>
>>> ~/bin/perf test --verbose 95 2>&1 | tee
>>> perf-test-verbose-95-perf-all-metrics-test_dileks-perf-6-2-rc5.txt
>>>
>>> [ TESTS - STOP ]
>>>
>>> echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
>>> /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
>>>
>>> - EOT -

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ