linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Add Cortex-A55 PMU node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8u=xmYghCtCcGg-fU02u0kcwGqeCKOs4iSfwkdUe1MbFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:04:44 +0000
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Add Cortex-A55 PMU node

Hi Mark and Will,

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:48 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Add Cortex-A55 PMU node
> >
> > Hi Biju,
> >
> > Thank you for the review.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:38 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Prabhakar,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > >
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Add Cortex-A55 PMU
> > > > node
> > > >
> > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > >
> > > > Enable the performance monitor unit for the Cortex-A55 cores on the
> > > > RZ/G2L
> > > > (r9a07g044) SoC.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar
> > > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
> > > > index 80b2332798d9..ff9bdc03a3ed 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi
> > > > @@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ opp-50000000 {
> > > >               };
> > > >       };
> > > >
> > > > +     pmu_a55 {
> > > > +             compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu";
> > > > +             interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_PPI 7
> > > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > >
> > > Just a question, Is it tested?
> > Yes this was tested with perf test
> >
> > > timer node[1] defines irq type as LOW, here it is high.
> > You are right looking at the RZG2L_InterruptMapping_rev01.xlsx this should
> > be LOW. (I followed the SPI IRQS where all the LEVEL interrupts are HIGH)
> >
> > > Also do we need to define (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) as
> > it has 2 cores??
> > >
> > No this is not required for example here [0] where it has 6 cores.
>
> I may be wrong, That is the only example[1], where the A55 PMU per cpu interrupts and number of a55 cores in the DT
> are not matching.
>
Some SoCs specify the GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(x) while describing the PPI
interrupt for the PMU and some dont [1]. What should be the correct
usage when specifying the PPI interrupts for the PMU with multiple CPU
cores (we are using
arm,cortex-a55-pmu)?

 [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/B/ident/arm%2Ccortex-a55-pmu

Cheers,
Prabhakar