linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm: dts: mt7623: add gmacs to mt7623.dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4e1b1a2-8e52-779f-ab4f-239b6a401c3f@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:53:44 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
        frank-w@...lic-files.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm: dts: mt7623: add gmacs to mt7623.dtsi



On 25/01/2023 17:52, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 25.01.2023 19:45, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> Am 20. Januar 2023 21:53:14 MEZ schrieb "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>:
>>
>>> index 25d31e40a553..5eb698a90d34 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
>>> @@ -981,6 +981,20 @@ eth: ethernet@...00000 {
>>>         #address-cells = <1>;
>>>         #size-cells = <0>;
>>>         status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> +        gmac0: mac@0 {
>>> +            compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac";
>>> +            reg = <0>;
>>> +            phy-mode = "trgmii";
>>> +            status = "disabled";
>>> +        };
>>> +
>>> +        gmac1: mac@1 {
>>> +            compatible = "mediatek,eth-mac";
>>> +            reg = <1>;
>>> +            phy-mode = "rgmii";
>>> +            status = "disabled";
>>> +        };
>>>     };
>>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts 
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
>>> index 5008115d2494..a5800a524302 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
>>> @@ -175,9 +175,7 @@ &eth {
>>>     status = "okay";
>>>
>>>     gmac0: mac@0 {
>>
>> Should node not be accessed with label (&gmac0) instead of defining it again 
>> and shadow the one from dtsi?
> 
> I think that's up to preference. I kept it the current way as it's cleaner than 
> taking it out of &eth.
> 

I'd prefer to do use the label, so that we stay consistent in the source tree.
I'll remove the whole series for now. Please provide a v2.

Thanks,
Matthias