linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the kunit-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230201163712.4336d3a1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 16:37:12 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the
 kunit-fixes tree

Hi David,

On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 12:31:49 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> As you noted, the "hooks" patch is meant to supersede "kunit: Export
> kunit_running()", which is really meant as a fix for older kernels
> which won't get the "hooks" patch.
> 
> I imagine we'll rebase this once the fixes go upstream.

Or just merge what you ask Linus to merge, for a minimal change.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped