linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: intel: Add support for controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 07:49:50 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mauro Lima <mauro.lima@...ypsium.com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: intel: Add support for controllers

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:04:55AM -0300, Mauro Lima wrote:
> Add Device IDs to the module table for the following controllers:
> 	- 9da4  Cannon Lake 300 Series On-Package
> 	- a2a4  200 Series/Z370 Chipset Family SPI Controller
> 	- 9d24  Intel® 200 Series Chipset Family (Including Intel® X299),
> 		Intel® Z370 Intel® H310C,B365,
> 		also Intel® B460 and H410 Chipset Platform Controller Hub
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Lima <mauro.lima@...ypsium.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-intel-pci.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-intel-pci.c b/drivers/spi/spi-intel-pci.c
> index 10fa3a7fa4f5..ba08f64e56eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-intel-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-intel-pci.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_spi_pci_ids[] = {
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa224), (unsigned long)&bxt_info },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa324), (unsigned long)&cnl_info },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa3a4), (unsigned long)&cnl_info },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9da4), (unsigned long)&cnl_info },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa2a4), (unsigned long)&cnl_info },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9d24), (unsigned long)&cnl_info },

Make sure these are sorted numerically.

Otherwise looks good, thanks for doing this!