lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wn51znsh.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:24:14 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
        maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 clocksource 6/7] clocksource: Verify HPET and PMTMR
 when TSC unverified

Paul!

On Tue, Jan 24 2023 at 16:27, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On systems with two or fewer sockets, when the boot CPU has CONSTANT_TSC,
> NONSTOP_TSC, and TSC_ADJUST, clocksource watchdog verification of the
> TSC is disabled.  This works well much of the time, but there is the
> occasional production-level system that meets all of these criteria, but
> which still has a TSC that skews significantly from atomic-clock time.
> This is usually attributed to a firmware or hardware fault.  Yes, the
> various NTP daemons do express their opinions of userspace-to-atomic-clock
> time skew, but they put them in various places, depending on the daemon
> and distro in question.  It would therefore be good for the kernel to
> have some clue that there is a problem.
>
> The old behavior of marking the TSC unstable is a non-starter because a
> great many workloads simply cannot tolerate the overheads and latencies
> of the various non-TSC clocksources.  In addition, NTP-corrected systems
> sometimes can tolerate significant kernel-space time skew as long as
> the userspace time sources are within epsilon of atomic-clock time.
>
> Therefore, when watchdog verification of TSC is disabled, enable it for
> HPET and PMTMR (AKA ACPI PM timer).  This provides the needed in-kernel
> time-skew diagnostic without degrading the system's performance.

I'm more than unhappy about this. We finally have a point where the TSC
watchdog overhead can go away without adding TSC=reliable to the kernel
commandline.

Now you add an unconditionally enforce the watchdog again in a way which
even cannot be disabled on the kernel command line.

Patently bad idea, no cookies for you!

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ