[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9qA81mcxeaHYxJX@feng-clx>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:10:43 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>, <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...a.com>, <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
<ak@...ux.intel.com>, <zhengjun.xing@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 clocksource 6/7] clocksource: Verify HPET and PMTMR
when TSC unverified
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 11:24:14AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Paul!
>
> On Tue, Jan 24 2023 at 16:27, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On systems with two or fewer sockets, when the boot CPU has CONSTANT_TSC,
> > NONSTOP_TSC, and TSC_ADJUST, clocksource watchdog verification of the
> > TSC is disabled. This works well much of the time, but there is the
> > occasional production-level system that meets all of these criteria, but
> > which still has a TSC that skews significantly from atomic-clock time.
> > This is usually attributed to a firmware or hardware fault. Yes, the
> > various NTP daemons do express their opinions of userspace-to-atomic-clock
> > time skew, but they put them in various places, depending on the daemon
> > and distro in question. It would therefore be good for the kernel to
> > have some clue that there is a problem.
> >
> > The old behavior of marking the TSC unstable is a non-starter because a
> > great many workloads simply cannot tolerate the overheads and latencies
> > of the various non-TSC clocksources. In addition, NTP-corrected systems
> > sometimes can tolerate significant kernel-space time skew as long as
> > the userspace time sources are within epsilon of atomic-clock time.
> >
> > Therefore, when watchdog verification of TSC is disabled, enable it for
> > HPET and PMTMR (AKA ACPI PM timer). This provides the needed in-kernel
> > time-skew diagnostic without degrading the system's performance.
>
> I'm more than unhappy about this. We finally have a point where the TSC
> watchdog overhead can go away without adding TSC=reliable to the kernel
> commandline.
>
> Now you add an unconditionally enforce the watchdog again in a way which
> even cannot be disabled on the kernel command line.
Yes, this is a valid concern. Waiman, Paul and I discussed this and
had some proposal to handle this side effect, like only watchdoging
HPET/ACPI-PM timer for a short period of time in this case.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221227183819.GI4001@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
My bad that I didn't follow up as my proposed code looked ugly as
bringing more complexsities. Does the idea of setting a watchdog
time limit sound fine to you?
Thanks,
Feng
> Patently bad idea, no cookies for you!
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists