[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9pZqOMBipT2NZk0@mi-HP-ProDesk-680-G4-MT>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:23:04 +0800
From: qixiaoyu <qxy65535@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: xiongping1@...omi.com, qixiaoyu1@...omi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] f2fs: fix wrong calculation of block age
> >
> > How about updating as below to avoid lossing accuracy if new is less than 100?
> >
> > return div_u64(new * (100 - LAST_AGE_WEIGHT), 100) +
> > div_u64(old * LAST_AGE_WEIGHT, 100);
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> We want to avoid overflow by doing the division first. To keep the accuracy, how
> about updating as below:
>
> res = div_u64_rem(new, 100, &rem_new) * (100 - LAST_AGE_WEIGHT)
> + div_u64_rem(old, 100, &rem_old) * LAST_AGE_WEIGHT;
> res += rem_new * (100 - LAST_AGE_WEIGHT) / 100 + rem_old * LAST_AGE_WEIGHT / 100;
> return res;
>
> Thanks,
>
Friendly ping
> > > }
> > > /* This returns a new age and allocated blocks in ei */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists