[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60832B131FF4FA87E21C62CFFCD19@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 16:15:47 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Stefan Talpalaru" <stefantalpalaru@...oo.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"Ostrovsky, Boris" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Martin Pohlack <mpohlack@...zon.de>
Subject: RE: [Patch v3 Part2 3/9] x86/microcode/intel: Fix collect_cpu_info()
to reflect current microcode
> So first of all, I'm wondering whether the scenario you're chasing is
> something completely hypothetical or you're actually thinking of
> something concrete which has actually happened or there's high potential
> for it.
Rare, but very real. For one of the speculative side channel microcode
updates there were some reports from large data centers that the kernel
choked on a WRMSR(IA32_SPEC_CTRL)
> In that case, that late patching sync algorithm would need to be made
> more robust to handle cases like that.
"
Yup. when you get through the cleanups and the "minrev" update Ashok
has a handful of final[1] patches that add robustness.
-Tony
[1] Yes, there is an end in sight to all these microcode changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists