[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66cfa719-6055-a521-6146-f629b7d0e446@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:16:41 +0100
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ionela.Voinescu@....com, qperret@...gle.com,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/topology: Remove EM_MAX_COMPLEXITY limit
Hello Peter,
Please let me know if there are additional modifications required,
Regards,
Pierre
On 11/30/22 18:11, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 21/11/2022 10:43, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>> From: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@....com>
>
> [...]
>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> v2:
>> - Fix complexity computation in the commit message. [Dietmar]
>> - Use correct/latest function names. [Ionela]
>> - Added Rb from Lukasz.
>> v3:
>> - Keep paragraph 6.3 in sched-energy.rst with just a reference to
>> EM_MAX_NUM_CPUS, reference EM_MAX_NUM_CPUS in the commit message.
>> [Dietmar]
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists