lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y91uWj6PiGQqI48J@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:28:10 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, irogers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/9] perf/x86/msr: Add Meteor Lake support

Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:21:15PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:34:02AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> > 
> > On 2023-02-01 8:47 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 12:13:47PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
> > >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Meteor Lake is Intel's successor to Raptor lake. PPERF and SMI_COUNT MSRs
> > >> are also supported.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > > 
> > > Did the kernel bits land upstream?
> > Yes, the kernel part has been merged into the tip.git perf/core branch.
> > 
> > Thanks for checking the status. There are two perf tool patches in this
> > series, which hasn't been merged. Should I resend them?
> 
> Lemme try cherry-picking just the tooling bits from this series.

There was a clash with:

commit 3fd7a168bf51497909dbfb7347af28b5c57e74a6
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Date:   Thu Jan 26 13:36:10 2023 -0800

    perf script: Add 'cgroup' field for output

And a minor fuzz on the first patch, I applied manually and resolved the
conflict,

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
  
> > Thanks,
> > Kan
> > > 
> > > - Arnaldo
> > >  
> > >> No change since V1
> > >>
> > >>  arch/x86/events/msr.c | 2 ++
> > >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/msr.c b/arch/x86/events/msr.c
> > >> index ecced3a52668..074150d28fa8 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/x86/events/msr.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/x86/events/msr.c
> > >> @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ static bool test_intel(int idx, void *data)
> > >>  	case INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE:
> > >>  	case INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P:
> > >>  	case INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S:
> > >> +	case INTEL_FAM6_METEORLAKE:
> > >> +	case INTEL_FAM6_METEORLAKE_L:
> > >>  		if (idx == PERF_MSR_SMI || idx == PERF_MSR_PPERF)
> > >>  			return true;
> > >>  		break;
> > >> -- 
> > >> 2.35.1
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> - Arnaldo

-- 

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ