linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] bcache: Remove some unnecessary NULL point check for the return value of __bch_btree_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230203032750.578589-1-zyytlz.wz@163.com>
Date:   Fri,  3 Feb 2023 11:27:50 +0800
From:   Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
To:     colyli@...e.de
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, hackerzheng666@...il.com,
        kent.overstreet@...il.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alex000young@...il.com,
        Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] bcache: Remove some unnecessary NULL point check for the  return value of __bch_btree_node_alloc-related pointer

Due to the previously fix of __bch_btree_node_alloc, the return value will
never be a NULL pointer. So IS_ERR is enough to handle the failure
 situation. Fix it by replacing IS_ERR_OR_NULL check to IS_ERR check.

Fixes: cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer cache")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
---
v2:
- Replace more checks
---
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 10 +++++-----
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 147c493a989a..7c21e54468bf 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static struct btree *btree_node_alloc_replacement(struct btree *b,
 {
 	struct btree *n = bch_btree_node_alloc(b->c, op, b->level, b->parent);
 
-	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(n)) {
+	if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
 		mutex_lock(&n->write_lock);
 		bch_btree_sort_into(&b->keys, &n->keys, &b->c->sort);
 		bkey_copy_key(&n->key, &b->key);
@@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
 	memset(new_nodes, 0, sizeof(new_nodes));
 	closure_init_stack(&cl);
 
-	while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r[nodes].b))
+	while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR(r[nodes].b))
 		keys += r[nodes++].keys;
 
 	blocks = btree_default_blocks(b->c) * 2 / 3;
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) {
 		new_nodes[i] = btree_node_alloc_replacement(r[i].b, NULL);
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_nodes[i]))
+		if (IS_ERR(new_nodes[i]))
 			goto out_nocoalesce;
 	}
 
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
 	bch_keylist_free(&keylist);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
-		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_nodes[i])) {
+		if (!IS_ERR(new_nodes[i])) {
 			btree_node_free(new_nodes[i]);
 			rw_unlock(true, new_nodes[i]);
 		}
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static int bch_btree_gc_root(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
 	if (should_rewrite) {
 		n = btree_node_alloc_replacement(b, NULL);
 
-		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(n)) {
+		if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
 			bch_btree_node_write_sync(n);
 
 			bch_btree_set_root(n);
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index ba3909bb6bea..7660962e7b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static void cache_set_flush(struct closure *cl)
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->gc_thread))
 		kthread_stop(c->gc_thread);
 
-	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->root))
+	if (!IS_ERR(c->root))
 		list_add(&c->root->list, &c->btree_cache);
 
 	/*
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ static int run_cache_set(struct cache_set *c)
 
 		err = "cannot allocate new btree root";
 		c->root = __bch_btree_node_alloc(c, NULL, 0, true, NULL);
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->root))
+		if (IS_ERR(c->root))
 			goto err;
 
 		mutex_lock(&c->root->write_lock);
-- 
2.25.1