[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c2c0e88-41d8-f9ec-d934-2d1752696b1a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:32:21 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jian Yang (杨戬) <Jian.Yang@...iatek.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Jianjun Wang (王建军)
<Jianjun.Wang@...iatek.com>, "kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@...iatek.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jieyy Yang (杨洁) <Jieyy.Yang@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuanjia Liu (柳传嘉)
<Chuanjia.Liu@...iatek.com>,
Qizhong Cheng (程啟忠)
<Qizhong.Cheng@...iatek.com>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Rex-BC Chen (陳柏辰)
<Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com>,
David-YH Chiu (邱鈺翔)
<David-YH.Chiu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add support for
controlling power and reset
On 03/02/2023 10:38, Jian Yang (杨戬) wrote:
>>> + pcie12v-supply:
>>> + description:
>>> + The regulator phandle that provides 12V power to downstream
>>> component.
>>> +
>>> + dsc-reset-gpios:
>>> + description:
>>> + The reset GPIO of a downstream component.
>>
>> Why you cannot use standard reset-gpios property?
>
> The "dsc-reset-gpios" represents an extra reset pin other than PERST#
> required by a PCIe downstream device. But the "reset-gpios", described
> in "pci.txt", represents the PERST#. So I tend to add a new property to
> meet this requirement.
OK
>>
>>> + description:
>>> + The delay time between assertion and de-assertion of a
>>> downstream
>>> + component's reset GPIO.
>>
>> Why this should be a property of DT?
>
> Same as the reason I described above. I suppose we need to add a
> property to let user determine the delay time due to differences
> in requirements between various devices.
No, I don't think we want individual properties like that. There is
ongoing discussion about this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221214095342.937303-1-alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com/
Feedback is welcomed - there. Don't create your own half-baked delays
for different hardware designs.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists