lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230205150217.2c21fc18@jic23-huawei> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 15:02:17 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> To: "Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com> Cc: "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: iio: dac: ad5592r: add gpio_chip names On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:11:30 +0000 "Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com> wrote: > -- > Antoniu Miclăuş > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 10:49 PM > > To: Miclaus, Antoniu <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com> > > Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: iio: dac: ad5592r: add gpio_chip names > > > > [External] > > > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:01:30 +0200 > > Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com> wrote: > > > > > Add array of explicit gpio names for the `gpiochip` structure of > > > ad5592r, mainly for debug purposes. > > Can you give an example of when this is more useful than the offset? > > (which I'm assuming is also available when debugging?) > > > > Jonathan > > > Hello Jonathan, > > I guess this patch is not mandatory. It is a gpio_chip structure member that was left unpopulated. > Also, I think it is nice to see explicitly the gpios under cat /sys/kernel/debug/gpio alongside the others. > This is the current output when trying to debug on a rpi (without the patch applied): > > analog@...log:~ $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/gpio > gpiochip0: GPIOs 0-57, parent: platform/fe200000.gpio, pinctrl-bcm2711: > gpio-0 (ID_SDA ) > gpio-1 (ID_SCL ) > gpio-2 (SDA1 ) > gpio-3 (SCL1 ) > gpio-4 (GPIO_GCLK ) > gpio-5 (GPIO5 ) > gpio-6 (GPIO6 ) > .... > gpiochip2: GPIOs 496-503, parent: spi/spi0.0, spi0.0, can sleep: > > gpiochip1: GPIOs 504-511, parent: platform/soc:firmware:gpio, raspberrypi-exp-gpio, can sleep: > gpio-504 (BT_ON ) > gpio-505 (WL_ON ) > gpio-506 (PWR_LED_OFF |led1 ) out lo ACTIVE LOW > gpio-507 (GLOBAL_RESET ) > gpio-508 (VDD_SD_IO_SEL |vdd-sd-io ) out hi > gpio-509 (CAM_GPIO |power_ctrl ) out lo > gpio-510 (SD_PWR_ON |sd_vcc_reg ) out hi > gpio-511 (SD_OC_N ) > > The gpiochip2, corresponding to ad5592r has no explicit gpios, due to the fact that the > gpio names were assigned. Thanks for the info. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for 0-day to poke at it an see if we missed anything. We are a bit tight timing wise, so this might end up in next cycle. Jonathan > > Regards, > > > > > > Since the gpios are configurable via the dts, generic names are > > > used. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c > > > index 7a9b5fc1e579..076bc9ecfb49 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c > > > @@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ static int ad5592r_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip > > *chip, unsigned offset) > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > +static const char * const ad5592r_gpio_names[] = { > > > + "GPIO0", "GPIO1", "GPIO2", "GPIO3", "GPIO4", "GPIO5", "GPIO6", > > "GPIO7", > > > +}; > > > + > > > static int ad5592r_gpio_init(struct ad5592r_state *st) > > > { > > > if (!st->gpio_map) > > > @@ -140,6 +144,7 @@ static int ad5592r_gpio_init(struct ad5592r_state > > *st) > > > st->gpiochip.set = ad5592r_gpio_set; > > > st->gpiochip.request = ad5592r_gpio_request; > > > st->gpiochip.owner = THIS_MODULE; > > > + st->gpiochip.names = ad5592r_gpio_names; > > > > > > mutex_init(&st->gpio_lock); > > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists