linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: Use generic ADC node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230205150645.549ff062@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 5 Feb 2023 15:06:45 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        iio@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: Use
 generic ADC node name

On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:25:01 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:44:46PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Update the example to reflect a future requirement for the generic
> > adc-chan node name on ADC channel nodes, while conveying the board name
> > of the channel in a label instead.  
> 
> I don't think we've defined 'adc-chan' as THE generic name. Looks like 
> we have:
> 
> adc-chan
> adc-channel
> channel
> 
> 'channel' is the most common (except for QCom).
Good spot.

We also have that defined as the channel name in 
bindings/iio/adc.yaml

Now this particular binding doesn't use anything from that
generic binding (other than trivial use of reg) but better to be
consistent with it than not!

Thanks,

Jonathan


> 
> Rob