[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230205190548.7auywdoagy6txpla@offworld>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:05:48 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] locktorture: With nested locks, occasionally skip
main lock
On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
>@@ -754,21 +755,28 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>
> lockset_mask = torture_random(&rand);
>+ skip_main_lock = nlocks && !(torture_random(&rand) % 100);
For the sake of future readers of locktorture.c, this deserves a comment
as to why we wanna skip the main lock (copy/paste from the changelog).
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists