linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230205190753.4sgvtxxaqcvr45ei@offworld>
Date:   Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:07:53 -0800
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture
 tests

On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:

>This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture
>tests, as well as new LOCK08 config files for testing mutexes
>with nested locking
>
>This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
>by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
>  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/
>
>Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>
>Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
>Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
>Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
>Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
>Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
>Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>

Just realized I sent two review tags for rtmutex, one was supposed
to be this patch.

Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>