[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230206112342.223d2c29@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:23:42 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Pietro Borrello <borrello@...g.uniroma1.it>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: pick_next_rt_entity(): checked list_entry
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:01:16 +0000
Pietro Borrello <borrello@...g.uniroma1.it> wrote:
> index ed2a47e4ddae..c024529d8416 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
>
> queue = array->queue + idx;
> + SCHED_WARN_ON(list_empty(queue));
I wonder if we should make this:
if (SCHED_WARN_ON(list_empty(queue)))
return NULL;
> next = list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
>
> return next;
> @@ -1789,7 +1790,6 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
>
> do {
> rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rt_rq);
> - BUG_ON(!rt_se);
if (unlikely(!rt_se))
return NULL;
-- Steve
> rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
> } while (rt_rq);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists