[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+FLQL08U7wXjqi+@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:47:28 -0800
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 05/11] mfd: rk808: split into core and i2c
On Sun, 05 Feb 2023, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 02:01:46PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Feb 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > Split rk808 into a core and an i2c part in preperation for
> > > > SPI support.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/clk/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 7 +-
> > > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 3 +-
> > > > drivers/mfd/{rk808.c => rk8xx-core.c} | 209 +++++---------------------
> > > > drivers/mfd/rk8xx-i2c.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 6 +
> > > > sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > 12 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > > > rename drivers/mfd/{rk808.c => rk8xx-core.c} (76%)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rk8xx-i2c.c
> > >
> > > Looks like you completely ignored (no response / no action) my review of
> > > v4. This submission is therefore not getting one! All comments can be
> > > superimposed from v4.
> >
> > s/v4/v5/
>
> not sure what you are talking about. I dropped the PM wrappers and
> added a new patch moving the driver to use OF match. There were no
> other comments as far as I can tell. Did I miss a second mail with
> more comments?
Ah, the driver was split *then* you implemented my suggestions.
That's not what I was expecting, but is also valid.
Very well, ignore my last - this set is back in my to-review queue.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists