[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1cd8c74-98f4-bff0-0344-cbece787c6e8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:47:13 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/shmem-helper: Fix locking for
drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt()
Hello Lina,
On 2/5/23 13:51, Asahi Lina wrote:
> Other functions touching shmem->sgt take the pages lock, so do that here
> too. drm_gem_shmem_get_pages() & co take the same lock, so move to the
> _locked() variants to avoid recursive locking.
>
> Discovered while auditing locking to write the Rust abstractions.
>
> Fixes: 2194a63a818d ("drm: Add library for shmem backed GEM objects")
> Fixes: 4fa3d66f132b ("drm/shmem: Do dma_unmap_sg before purging pages")
> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
> ---
Good catch. The patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
What about drm_gem_shmem_free() BTW, I believe that the helper should also
grab the lock before unmap / free the sgtable?
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists