linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rfkill: Use sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:04:52 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>
Cc:     johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of
 sprintf()

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 03:16:41AM -0500, Bo Liu wrote:
> Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show()
> should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the
> value to be returned to user space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>
> ---
>  net/rfkill/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Hi Bo Liu,

A brief summary of changes since v1 should go here.

Comparing v1 and v2 manually, I see that you have addressed the minor
issues raised in the review of v1:
* the checkpatch warning regarding ' )'
* Including target tree, net-next, in subject

Ref: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Y91bc2LWMl+DsjcW@corigine.com/

So, FWIIW, I am happy with this patch now.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>