[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230206020716.2036-1-zhongjinghua@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:07:16 +0800
From: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
To: <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<zhongjinghua@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<yukuai3@...wei.com>, <houtao1@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next v2] loop: loop_set_status_from_info() check before assignment
In loop_set_status_from_info(), lo->lo_offset and lo->lo_sizelimit should
be checked before reassignment, because if an overflow error occurs, the
original correct value will be changed to the wrong value, and it will not
be changed back.
Modifying to the wrong value logic is always not quiet right, we hope to
optimize this.
Signed-off-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
---
v1->v2: Modify note: overflowing -> overflow
drivers/block/loop.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 1518a6423279..1b35cbd029c7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -977,13 +977,13 @@ loop_set_status_from_info(struct loop_device *lo,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* Avoid assigning overflow values */
+ if (info->lo_offset > LLONG_MAX || info->lo_sizelimit > LLONG_MAX)
+ return -EOVERFLOW;
+
lo->lo_offset = info->lo_offset;
lo->lo_sizelimit = info->lo_sizelimit;
- /* loff_t vars have been assigned __u64 */
- if (lo->lo_offset < 0 || lo->lo_sizelimit < 0)
- return -EOVERFLOW;
-
memcpy(lo->lo_file_name, info->lo_file_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
lo->lo_file_name[LO_NAME_SIZE-1] = 0;
lo->lo_flags = info->lo_flags;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists