[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+EmeP3ccaxxaBHX@orome>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 17:10:32 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
jarkko@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, skomatineni@...dia.com, ldewangan@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V2 2/4] tpm: tegra: Support SPI tpm wait state detect
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 01:19:04PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:02:56PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am 03.02.23 um 14:01 schrieb Krishna Yarlagadda:
>
> > > + /* If the SPI device has an IRQ then use that */
> > > + if (dev->irq > 0)
> > > + irq = dev->irq;
> > > + else
> > > + irq = -1;
>
> > Use ternary operator?
>
> > irq = dev->irq > 0 ? dev->irq : -1;
>
> No, please write the code using normal conditional instructions. This
> isn't the IOCCC and the ternery operator is rarely a legibility aid.
Looks like the SPI core sets dev->irq = 0 for any error other than
-EPROBE_DEFER and the TPM TIS core checks for irq != 0 before trying to
setup that IRQ, so seems like we can just skip this altogether and pass
in dev->irq directly.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists