linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 11/45] clk: mediatek: mt8365: Move apmixedsys clock driver to its own file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:14:38 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        johnson.wang@...iatek.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
        chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, daniel@...rotopia.org,
        fparent@...libre.com, msp@...libre.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, zhaojh329@...il.com,
        sam.shih@...iatek.com, edward-jw.yang@...iatek.com,
        yangyingliang@...wei.com, granquet@...libre.com,
        pablo.sun@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
        chen.zhong@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/45] clk: mediatek: mt8365: Move apmixedsys clock
 driver to its own file

Il 07/02/23 08:12, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation for migrating all other mt8365 clocks to the common
>> mtk_clk_simple_probe(), move apmixedsys clocks to a different file.
>> While at it, use the builtin_platform_driver() macro for it.
> 
> `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space`
> agrees this is mostly a code move.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile                |   2 +-
>>   drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365.c            | 142 ----------------
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> 
> But see below.
> 
>>   3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
>> index 3c7dd19cdddf..b004a47026d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
>> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8195) += clk-mt8195-apmixedsys.o clk-mt8195-topckgen.o
>>                                     clk-mt8195-venc.o clk-mt8195-vpp0.o clk-mt8195-vpp1.o \
>>                                     clk-mt8195-wpe.o clk-mt8195-imp_iic_wrap.o \
>>                                     clk-mt8195-apusys_pll.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8365) += clk-mt8365.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8365) += clk-mt8365.o clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8365_APU) += clk-mt8365-apu.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8365_CAM) += clk-mt8365-cam.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8365_MFG) += clk-mt8365-mfg.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6f0fdf92bbd2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8365-apmixedsys.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Collabora Ltd.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8365-clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> 
> like in the MT2712 patch, this could be clk-provider.h .
> Or maybe we should do a pass of header cleanup? There's a bunch left
> over from the conversion from |struct clk| to |structk clk_hw|, and
> then migration to mtk_clk_simple_probe.
> 
> What do you think?
> 

I'm more for a separated pass of header cleanup, honestly...

Cheers,
Angelo