[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87edr1wzoz.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:13:32 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...a.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] module: replace module_layout with module_memory
On Mon, Feb 06 2023 at 23:27, Song Liu wrote:
>> On Feb 6, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>> +static void free_mod_mem(struct module *mod)
>>> +{
>>> + /* free the memory in the right order to avoid use-after-free */
>>
>> How do we end up with a UAF when the ordering is different?
>
> IIUC, we need remove MOD_DATA at last, which hosts "mod".
Oh. Please add a comment to that effect.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists