linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: improve wb,mbl-gpio binding documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:48:15 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Leonard, Niall" <Niall.Leonard@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: improve wb,mbl-gpio binding
 documentation.

On 07/02/2023 10:49, Leonard, Niall wrote:
>> Drop all examples below, they are not needed. Actually even these two
>> above could be combined as they differ with only one property.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Thanks for reviewing. I'll make the suggested changes.
> 
> You might note that I added myself as maintainer of this file (as it 
> wouldn't pass the dt checks otherwise) but that can't really be the case 
> going forwards. I have only converted it from txt to yaml. Who should be 
> the maintainer ? There was no-one listed as maintainer previously ?

If you are not interested in maintaining this binding, then as last
resort add here subsystem maintainers (Linus and Bartosz) but it isn't
really correct... just better than nothing.

Best regards,
Krzysztof