lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2023 14:38:11 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To:     Niall Leonard <nl250060@....com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: mmio: Use new flag BGPIOF_NO_INPUT.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:49:38PM +0000, Niall Leonard wrote:
> Add new flag BGPIOF_NO_INPUT to header file.
> Use the existing shadow data register 'bgpio_data' to allow
> the last written value to be returned by the read operation
> when BGPIOF_NO_INPUT flag is set.
> Ensure this change only applies to the specific binding "wd,mbl-gpio".

I'm wondering why do we need that.

I mean the reading back the (possible cached) output value is the right thing
to do by default for GPIO (in output mode) or GPO. So, instead you can simply
check the current direction of the pin and return (cached) value.

Or did I miss something?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ